Concord Special
Education Parent Advisory Committee
(Concord SPED PAC)
A Summary of the Concord Public School Report (K-8)
A seven member Massachusetts Department of
Education team visited Concord Public Schools during the week of May 7,
2001 to evaluate the implementation of selected criteria in the program
areas of special
education, civil rights requirements, Title I, the Safe and Drug Free
Schools
and Communities Act, and Nutrition Programs and Services.
The report includes findings in the program areas reviewed organized
under nine components directly related to teaching and learning (i.e.
evaluation, programs, child find, etc.) .
The findings in each program area describe determinations
by
the DOE team about the implementation status or “Rating” of each
criterion
reviewed.
There were 5 Possible Ratings:
Commendable |
Any requirement or aspect of a requirement implemented in an
exemplary manner significantly beyond the requirements of law or
regulation. |
Implemented |
The requirement is substantially met. |
Implementation in Progress |
The criterion includes one or more new state special
education requirements which became effective on September 1, 2000. The
district has substantially implemented any pre September 1, 2000
requirements also included under the criterion and is currently engaged
in staff training and/or is beginning
implementation practices for new requirements which the Department's
onsite
team anticipates will result in substantial compliance by the end of
the
current school year. |
Partially Implemented |
The requirement, in one or several important aspects, is not
entirely met. |
Not Implemented |
The requirement is totally or substantially not met. |
The findings note those criteria which were found by the team to
be substantially “Implemented” or implemented in a “Commendable”
manner. Where criteria were found to be either "Partially
Implemented" or "Not Implemented," the district must propose to the
Department corrective actions to bring those areas into compliance with
the related statute or regulation. In some instances the team may
have rated a requirement as “Implementation in Progress” or
“Implemented” and has made specific comment on the district's
implementation methods which also may require response from the
district .
The following table shows a summary of the CPS and CCHS audit
findings:
|
DOE
Rating |
CPS |
CCHS |
|
Commendable |
1* |
6 |
|
Implemented |
30 |
36 |
|
Implementation in Progress |
0 |
0 |
This webpage focus on these items |
Partially Implemented |
25 |
12 |
|
Not Implemented |
1* |
0 |
* = |
Commendable
= 1, rating was for our SPEDPAC which exceeded the
requirements as a PAC. |
* =
|
Not
Implemented = 1, (SE 29
) rating was for English as a Second Langange (ESL), there is no
documentation of written policy, procedures or efforts to provide
communications to parents in the native language of the home. |
The following is a summary of just Special Education items (25
Parially Implemented) that were not fully implemented and will require
a response from our school district (Corrective Action Plan (CAP)).
Take a look at what requirements are not currently being met in the
K - 8 special education area.
When you click on each of the following you will see the requirement
Criterion reviewed and then the DOE's
determination about the implementation status. The DOE's response is
Italicized.
Anne Randle, one of chairs, presentated our response to the
School
Committee on June 11, 2002 meeting. All our members were invited
to
attend this meeting. At the end of the presentation all three
chairs
were asked to join the school committee table for a question and answer
session
at the end of our presentation. We had a good turn out and thank
our
members for the show of support.
Our input from our members were collected though our website,
email
messages, phone calls and personal contact with our members.
View the full report
on-line (PDF format) in which the DOE rated Concord Public Schools
on a total 57 specific special education items.
Index of Partially
Implemented items
Click on them for more detail:
Evaluation
SE 1 - Assessments are appropriately selected and
interpreted for students referred for evaluation.
SE 2 - Required and optional assessments - assessments
are completed by appropriately credentialed and trained specialists for
each referred
student.
IEP
SE 8 - Evaluation Team composition
SE 18 - IEP development and content; determination of
placement; provision of IEP to parent
SE 36 - IEP implementation, accountability and
financial
responsibility
SE 24 - Programs for young children three and four
years of age
SE 50 - Responsibilities of the School Principal and
Administrator of Special Education
Principal, Instructional support, Curriculum Accommodation Plan (CAP),
Coordination with special education, Educational services in home or
hospital and Administrator of Special Education.
Time
SE 9 - Eligibility determination: Timelines
for evaluation, provision of IEP or
identification of other needed instructional programs
SE 12 - Frequency of re-evaluation
Every three years, or sooner if necessary, the school district, with
parental consent, conducts a full three-year re-evaluation consistent
with the requirements of federal law.
Reports
SE 13 - Progress Reports and content
Child Find
SE 15 - Outreach by the School District (Child Find)
SE 16 - Screening
SE 17 - Initiation of services at age three and Early
Intervention transition procedures
Programs
SE 20 - Least restrictive program selected
SE 22 - IEP implementation and availability
SE 34 - Continuum of alternative services and
placements
SE 53 - Use of paraprofessionals
SE 56 - Special education programs and services are
evaluated
Confidentiality
SE 23 - Confidentiality of personally identifiable
information
SE 25 - Parental consent Notice
SE 26 - Parent participation in meetings
ESL
SE 29 - Communications
are in English and primary language of home
Certifications
SE 52 - Appropriate certifications or other
credentials
-- related services
Staff development
SE 54 - Professional development regarding special
education
Building
SE 55 - Special education facilities and classrooms
Detail description
Evaluation:
SE 1 - Assessments are appropriately selected
and interpreted for students referred for evaluation.
- Tests and other evaluation materials are:
a. validated
b. administered and interpreted by trained individuals
c. tailored to assess specific areas of educational need
d. selected and administered to reflect aptitude and achievement
levels
e. as free as possible from cultural and linguistic bias
f. provided in the student's native language or other mode of
communication where feasible
g. not the sole criterion for determining an appropriate
educational program
h. not only those designed to provide a single general
intelligence quotient
i. are selected and administered to ensure that when a test is
administered to a student with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking
skills, the test
results accurately reflect the student's aptitude or achievement level
or
the other factors the test purports to measure
j. technically sound instruments that may assess the relative
contribution of cognitive and behavioral factors, in addition to
physical or developmental factors.
- In interpreting evaluation data and making decisions, the
district:
a. uses information from a variety of sources to gather relevant
functional and developmental information, including information
provided by the parent
b. ensures that information obtained from these sources is considered
c. ensures that the placement decision conforms with placement in the
least restrictive environment
d. includes information related to enabling the student to be
involved in and progress in the general curriculum.
Interviews and the review of student records showed that the
district tends to use a standard battery of assessments,
- some of which are outdated, for initial evaluations and
re-evaluations
- rather than assessments related to the suspected area(s) of
disability and individualized to the student.
- There is not a wide range of assessments available as a
resource for evaluators to ensure that initial evaluations and
re-evaluations address specific areas of educational need.
In addition, there was no documentation regarding the provision of
assessments for initial evaluations and re-evaluations in a student's
native language.
Return to index
SE 2 - Required and optional assessments -
assessments are completed
by appropriately credentialed and trained specialists for each
referred student.
- Optional assessments: The Administrator of Special Education may
recommend or the parent may request one or more
- At the re-evaluation of a student, if the Team decides that no
additional assessments are needed to determine whether the student
continues to be
eligible for special education, the school district recommends to the
student's
parents the following
- The district consults with the child's parents regarding the
evaluators to be used for all required and optional assessments
A review of student records revealed inconsistent documentation of
teacher assessments.
- The assessments that were reviewed were lacking in
specificity
in addressing a student's classroom performance.
- In addition, there was no evidence of recommendations made
to
parents regarding the waiving of assessments for re-evaluations.
- The district has a practice of using the preschool screening
in place of an initial evaluation to identify services and make program
recommendations for a child rather than implementing the mandated
procedures for a referral for a special education evaluation.
There was no documentation of observations for children being
assessed to determine eligibility for services at age three.
Return to index
IEP
SE 8 - Evaluation Team composition
1. Interviews indicated that a person who is a representative of
the district and has the authority to commit the resources of the
district is not always present at Team meetings.
2. In addition, the chairperson is not always knowledgeable
regarding the IEP process and the availability of the district's
resources, which
results in an inconsistent implementation of regulations and in
misinformation
being communicated to parents.
Return
to index
Time
SE 9 - Eligibility determination: Timelines
for evaluation, provision of IEP and/or identification of other needed
instructional programs
Within forty-five school working days after receipt of the parent's
written consent to an initial evaluation, unscheduled evaluation, or
re-evaluation, the school district.
- If a Team determines that a student is not eligible for special
education but may be eligible for accommodation(s) for disability(ies)
under Section 504, the student is referred for consideration by the
district for eligibility under that regular education program.
- Where a Team finds students eligible for special education only
in need of "monitoring services", such students are found no longer
eligible for special education and are provided with appropriate
supports through the
district's regular education program.
Based upon review of student records, the onsite team found that the
district is inconsistent in its adherence to the timelines for
evaluations
and re-evaluations and subsequent Team meetings and consistently
exceeds
the timeline for the provision of the IEP to parents. Interviews
indicated
that the district does not have operational computer capability to
allow
special education personnel and the special education administration
access
to the IEP documentation needed to provide the IEPs to the parents
within
the mandated timeline. There was inconsistent documentation of the
parent’s
written consent to evaluate. Interviews indicated that all staff do not
have
sufficient working knowledge of Section 504 to make a referral for a
student
with a disability who is eligible for accommodations.
Return to index
SE 12 - Frequency of re-evaluation
Every three years, or sooner if necessary, the school district, with
parental consent, conducts a full three-year re-evaluation consistent
with the requirements of federal law.
The district does not always provide the re-evaluation within
three years and within 45 days after receipt of the parent’s consent.
Return to index
Report
SE 13 - Progress Reports and content
1. Parents receive reports on the student's progress toward reaching
the goals set in the IEP at least as often as parents are informed of
the progress of non-disabled students.
2. Progress report information sent to parents includes written
information on the student’s progress toward the annual goals in the
IEP, including
information on the extent to which such progress is sufficient to
enable
the child to achieve the goals by the end of the year.
Return to index
Child Find
SE 15 - Outreach by the School District
(Child Find)
The district has annual or more frequent outreach and continuous
liaison with those groups below from which promotion or transfer of
students in
need of special education may be expected, or which would include
students
in need of special education:
- professionals in community
- private nursery schools
- day care facilities
- group homes
- parent organizations
- clinical /health care agencies
- early intervention programs
- other public/private/parochial schools
- other agencies/organizations
- the school itself (particularly within charter schools)
- agencies serving migrant and/or homeless persons
Interviews indicated that the district needs to implement a more
systematic outreach to the community to identify children in need of
special education.
Return to index
SE 16 - Screening
- The school district conducts screening for three and four year
olds and for all children who are of age to enter kindergarten. Such
screening is designed to review a child’s development and to assist in
identification of those children who should be referred for an
evaluation to determine
eligibility for special education services.
- Participation in the screening program for three and four year
olds is optional on the part of the parents.
Provision is made for ongoing and periodic screening of all students as
required by the Department of Public Health (vision, hearing, posture).
The district conducts preschool and kindergarten screenings.
However, there is not a formalized process in place to:
- assess children adequately to ensure the early
identification of those in need of special education;
- provide the results of the screening to the parent;
- follow up when concerns regarding a child’s development or
performance are noted. In addition, the district has a practice of
determining special education services and making program
recommendations based upon the results of the preschool screening
rather than initiating a referral for a special education evaluation.
Interviews indicated that three- and four-year-old children who are
in need of special education services have not been referred due to the
lack of programs available within the district at the preschool level.
Return to index
SE 17 - Initiation of services at age three and
Early Intervention transition procedures
- The school district encourages referrals from the Department of
Public Health, other agencies, and individuals for young children when
or before the child turns two-and-one-half years old in order to ensure
continuity
of services and to ensure the development and implementation of an IEP
for
eligible children by the date of the child's third birthday in
accordance
with federal requirements.
- The district implements procedures to ensure the effective
transition of young children with disabilities from Early Intervention
Programs through participation in transition planning conferences
arranged by such programs.
Refer to the finding under SE 16 above
Return to index
IEP
SE 18 - IEP development and content;
determination of placement; provision of IEP to parent
- Upon determining that the student is eligible for special
education, the Team, including the parent(s), develops an IEP using the
evaluation data to guide development of measurable, annual goals and
objectives/benchmarks for the student. If the district chooses to draft
any element(s) of the
IEP for discussion, the Team Chairperson ensures that those elements
are
genuinely considered prior to adoption at the Team meeting. All
ideas
and needs of the child as expressed by all Team members, especially the
parents,
are genuinely considered by the district prior to proposing the IEP.
- The IEP includes specially designed instruction to meet the
needs of the individual student and related services as necessary to
allow the student
to benefit from the specially designed instruction or to access the
general
curriculum, consistent with federal and state requirements.
- In developing the IEP, the Team proposes specially designed
instruction and related services according to the needs of the child
and not according the availability of such instruction or related
services.
- The IEP is completed addressing all elements of the standard IEP
format provided by the Department of Education.
- If the Team members are unable to agree on the IEP, the Team
chairperson states the elements of the IEP proposed by the school
district.
- The school district ensures that each IEP Team has at least one
person with authority to commit the resources of the district and that
whatever
services are set out in the IEP will actually be provided and that the
IEP
will not be changed at a higher administrative level within the
district.
- After the IEP has been fully developed, the Team, including the
parent, determines the appropriate type of placement to deliver
the services on the student’s IEP.
- The school district determines the specific classroom or school,
giving careful consideration to the Team’s recommendation(s), if any,
at
which services will be provided to implement the placement decision of
the
Team.
- The IEP is written in generally understandable language.
- Immediately following the development of the IEP, the district
provides the parent with a copy of the proposed IEP along with the
required notice without undue delay.
Interviews indicated that the district has a practice of determining
the placement before developing the IEP services.
The district then designs the service profile to fit into the
program and the placement rather than following the mandated procedure:
first to
develop the services, goals, and objectives, and then to determine a
placement
that will fit the student’s service needs.
In addition, as stated under SE 8 and SE 9, a representative of
the district who has the authority to commit its resources is not
always present at Team meetings, and parents are not being provided
with the proposed IEP within the mandated timeline.
Return to index
Program
SE 20 - Least restrictive program selected
- The program selected is the least restrictive environment for
students, with consideration given to any potential harmful effect on
the student
or on the quality of services that he or she needs.
- If the student is removed from the general education classroom
at any time, the Team states why the removal is considered critical to
the student’s program and the basis for its conclusion that education
of the student in a less restrictive environment, with the use of
supplementary aids and services, could not be achieved satisfactorily.
- The district does not remove an eligible child from the general
education classroom solely because of needed modification in the
curriculum.
The documentation addresses the district’s commitment to educating
students within the least restrictive environment. The middle school
personnel reported that the house system promotes a high level of
inclusion and daily communication regarding student progress and
needs. However, interviews indicated that accommodations and
modifications on students’ IEPs are not always implemented when needed
in the general education classroom. There is an accepted practice,
especially at the elementary level, of referring a student for a
special education
evaluation rather than searching for alternative strategies to
accommodate
the student’s needs and modify the curriculum within the general
education
classroom.
Return to index
SE 22 - IEP implementation and availability
- Where the IEP of the student in need of special education has
been accepted in whole or in part by that student's parent, the school
district provides the mutually agreed upon services without delay.
- At the beginning of each school year, the district has an IEP in
effect for each eligible student within its jurisdiction.
- Each teacher and provider described in the IEP is informed of
his or her specific responsibilities related to the implementation of
the student’s IEP.
- The school district does not delay implementation of the IEP due
to lack of classroom space or personnel, provides as many of the
services
on the accepted IEP as possible and immediately informs parents in
writing
of any delayed services, reasons for delay, actions that the school
district is taking to address the lack of space or personnel and offers
alternative methods to meet the goals on the accepted IEP. Upon
agreement of the parents, the school district implements alternative
methods immediately until the
lack of space or personnel issues are resolved.
Interviews and parent surveys indicated that parents are not
always notified when there has been a delay in the provision of IEP
services.
Return to index
Confidentiality
SE 23 - Confidentiality of personally
identifiable information
The district protects the confidentiality of any personally
identifiable information that is collected, used or maintained in
accordance with federal and state law.
Interviews indicated that staff have not been fully apprised of
federal and state requirements regarding the protection of student
confidentiality. In addition, as referred to under SE 55 in Component
VII below, space constraints within the school buildings have
compromised the ability of the service
providers in areas such as psychological services and counseling to
protect
student confidentiality fully.
Return to index
SE 25 - Parental consent
In accordance with state and federal law, the school district
obtains
informed parental consent as follows:
- The school district obtains consent before conducting an
evaluation to determine eligibility for special education or before
conducting a re-evaluation as required every three years or earlier if
necessary.
- The school district obtains consent before initiating extended
evaluation services.
- The school district obtains consent to the services proposed on
a student’s IEP before providing such services.
- The school district obtains consent prior to placing a student
in an initial special education placement and for any subsequent
placement.
- A parent is informed that consent may be revoked at any
time.
- If the school district is unable to obtain parental consent to a
reevaluation or to placement in a special education program subsequent
to
the child's initial placement in special education, or the parent
revokes
consent to such reevaluation or placement, the district considers with
the
parent whether such action will result in the denial of a free
appropriate
public education to the child, and if so, the school district seeks
resolution
through the Bureau of Special Education Appeals.
- The attempts of the district to secure the consent of the parent
are documented through letters, written notices sent by certified mail,
telephone calls and home visits at such time as the parent is likely to
be home.
The district has a practice at the elementary level of initiating
special education services, placing student in a special education
program or changing IEP services before obtaining written parental
consent. There was inconsistent documentation in the student records of
written parental consent for the
provision of services and placement and for initial evaluations and
re-evaluations.
Return to index
Notice
SE 26 - Parent participation in meetings
- The district ensures that one or both parents of a child are
members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement
of their child.
- The Administrator of Special Education notifies parent(s) in
writing of any Team meeting early enough to ensure that they have an
opportunity to
attend.
- The district schedules the meeting at a mutually agreed upon
time and place; and documents such efforts.
- If neither parent can attend, the district uses other methods to
ensure parent participation, including individual or conference
telephone
calls, or video conferencing.
- In cases where the district, after reasonable efforts, is unable
to obtain the parents’ participation in Team meeting discussions and
decisions, the district conducts the Team meeting and documents its
attempts to facilitate the parents’ participation.
Based upon interviews and the review of student records, it appears
that the district is committed to ensuring that parents and students
are
full participants in the Team process: this was evident in the high
level
of parent participation in Team meetings. There was, however,
inconsistent
documentation of Team meeting notices in the student records.
Return to index
ESL
SE 29 - Communications are in English and
primary language of home
- Communications with parents are in both English and the primary
language of the home if such primary language is other than English.
Any interpreter used in fulfilling these requirements is fluent in the
primary language
of the home and familiar with special education procedures, programs
and
services. If the parents or the student are unable to read in any
language
or are blind or deaf, communications required by these regulations are
made
orally in English with the use of a foreign language interpreter, in
Braille,
in sign language, via TTY, or in writing, whichever is appropriate, and
that
all such communications are documented.
- If the district provides notices orally or in some other mode of
communication that is not written language, the district keeps written
documentation
(1) that it has provided such notice in an alternate manner, (2) that
the
content of the notice and (3) the steps taken to ensure that the parent
understands the content of the notice.
No documentation was presented of written policy and procedures or
of efforts the district has made to provide communications to parents
in the native language of the home or in an appropriate alternative
mode.
Return to index
SE 34 - Continuum of alternative services and
placements
The district provides or arranges for the provision of each of the
elements of the IEPs of students in need of special education from the
ages of three through twenty-one, ensuring that a continuum of services
and alternative placements is available to meet the needs of all
students with disabilities, and takes all steps necessary to ensure
compliance with all elements of
the IEPs, including vocational education.
The district has made some proactive efforts to reduce the gaps
in
the continuum of services; these efforts include the formation of the
language-based program at the Alcott School and the initiation of the
co-teaching model
to foster increased collaboration between the regular and special
education
staff. Interviews indicated that the C.A.S.E. Collaborative programs
are
a valued asset to the district’s continuum of services and that the
district
has established a close working relationship with the staff and
administration
of the C.A.S.E. Collaborative to promote ongoing communication and
collaboration.
However, there are major concerns about the lack of options
within
regular and special education to meet the needs of all students with
disabilities.
Interviews indicated that the areas of need are:
- differentiated instruction, approaches and programs within
the
general curriculum in reading, math and writing to ensure access for
all
students;
- in-district preschool programs;
- services for students with learning disabilities who are
currently not being fully served within the general curriculum;
- services and programs to address students’ behavioral needs;
- additional services and programs for students within the
autistic spectrum;
early identification of K-2 students who are not effectively
progressing within the general curriculum and may be in need of special
education services.
Return to index
IEP
SE 36 - IEP implementation, accountability
and financial responsibility
- The district ensures that IEPs are implemented without delay
upon
parent consent.
- The district oversees in an ongoing manner the full
implementation of each in-district and each out-of-district IEP it
proposes which has been consented to by a child’s parents.
- The district makes a good faith effort to assist the child to
achieve the goals and objectives or benchmarks listed in the IEP.
- The district provides all programs and services without
expense to the child’s parents.
- Each time the school district proposes to access the parent’s
private insurance proceeds to support the costs of IEP implementation,
the school district obtains the parent’s consent and informs the
parents that their refusal
to permit the school district to access their private insurance does
not
relieve the district of its responsibility to ensure that all required
services
are provided at no cost to the parents.
Interviews and parent surveys indicated that parents are not always
notified when there has been a delay in the provision of IEP
services.
(Same as the finding under SE 22 in Component II above).
Return to index
SE 24 - Programs for young children three
and four years of age
General requirements:
- The school district ensures programs are available for eligible
children three and four years of age. Such programs shall be
developmentally appropriate and specially designed for children ages
three and four years.
- Where at all possible the school district accepts referrals from
the Department of Public Health, other agencies, and individuals for
young
children when or before the child turns two-and-one-half years old in
order
to ensure continuity of services and to ensure the development and
implementation
of an IEP for eligible children by the date of the child's third
birthday
in accordance with federal requirements.
- Where appropriate, the school district elects, consistent with
federal requirements to use the format and services of the
Individualized Family
Service Plan (IFSP), if appropriate, for an additional year as a means
of
transitioning eligible children to public school services.
- Where appropriate the Team allows a child to remain in a program
designed for three and four year old children for the duration of the
school
year in which the child turns five years old (including the summer
following
the date of the child's fifth birthday).
Types of Settings:
- Inclusionary programs for young children are located in
a setting that includes children with and without disabilities and meet
the following standards:
- Services in such programs are provided in the home, the public
school, Head Start, or a licensed childcare setting.
b. For public school programs that integrate children with and
without disabilities, the class size does not exceed twenty (20) with
one teacher and one aide and no more than five (5) students with
disabilities. If the number of students with disabilities is six (6) or
seven (7) then the class size does not exceed fifteen (15) students
with one teacher and one aide.
- Substantially separate programs for young children are
located in a public school classroom or facility that serves primarily
or solely children
with disabilities. Substantially separate programs adhere to the
following
standards:
- Substantially separate programs are programs in which more
than 50% of the children have disabilities.
- Substantially separate programs operated by the district limit
class sizes to nine (9) students with one teacher and one aide.
The district provides two options for three- and four-year-old
children in need of special education services. The C.A.S.E.
Collaborative offers
a substantially separate program; the district provides related
services
only. Refer to the finding under SE 16 in Component II above.
Return to index
SE 50 - Responsibilities of the School
Principal and Administrator of Special Education
Principal:
- Instructional support. The principal in each of the
district’s schools promotes instructional practices responsive to
student needs and ensures
that adequate instructional support is available for students and
teachers.
Instructional support includes remedial instruction for students,
consultative
services for teachers, availability of reading instruction at the
elementary
level, appropriate services for linguistic minority students, and other
services
consistent with effective educational practices and the requirements of
MGL
c. 71B, §2. The principal consults with the Administrator of
Special
Education regarding accommodations and interventions for students. Such
efforts and their results are documented and placed in the student
record. Additionally, when an individual student is referred for an
evaluation to determine eligibility for special education, the
principal ensures that documentation on the use of instructional
support services for the student is provided as
part of the evaluation information reviewed by the Team when
determining eligibility.
- Curriculum Accommodation Plan (CAP) The principal
implements a curriculum accommodation plan adopted by the district to
ensure that all efforts have been made to meet students’ needs in
regular education. The plan
assists the regular classroom teacher in analyzing and accommodating
diverse
learning styles of all children in the regular classroom and in
providing appropriate services and support within the regular education
program including, but not limited to, direct and systemic instruction
in reading and provision of services to address the needs of children
whose behavior may interfere with learning. The Plan includes teacher
training in (1) analyzing and accommodating diverse learning styles of
all students in order to achieve an objective of
inclusion in the regular classroom of students with diverse learning
styles; (2) methods of collaboration among teachers, paraprofessionals
and teacher assistants to accommodate such styles; and (3) training in
the provision of
pre-referral services within regular education, teacher mentoring and
collaboration
and parental involvement.
- Coordination with special education. The principal with
the assistance of the Administrator of Special Education coordinates
the delivery and supervision of special education services within each
school building.
- Educational services in home or hospital. Upon receipt
of
a physician’s written order verifying that any student enrolled in a
public school or placed by the public school in a private setting must
remain at home or in a hospital on a day or overnight basis, or any
combination of both,
for medical reasons and for a period of not less than fourteen school
days
in any school year, the principal arranges for provision of educational
services
in the home or hospital. Such services are provided with sufficient
frequency
to allow the student to continue his or her educational program, as
long
as such services do not interfere with the medical needs of the
student. The
principal coordinates such services with the Administrator for Special
Education
for eligible students. Such educational services are not be considered
special
education unless the student has been determined eligible for such
services,
and the services include services on the student’s IEP.
Administrator of Special Education: - The school district
has an appointed person to be its Administrator of Special Education.
The Administrator supervises all special education for the school
district and ensures compliance with all federal and state special
education laws. As appropriate, and in accordance with the requirements
of MGL c.71B, §3A, the Administrator may designate other school
district personnel to carry out some of the duties of the Administrator.
The district’s curriculum accommodation plan does not include a
policy and procedures for the provision of educational services at home
or in a hospital. Based upon interviews, it appears that the expertise
of regular education teachers is not being used on the student review
teams in planning instructional support.
In addition, students at risk are not being provided
instructional
interventions in a timely fashion. The instructional support
intervention
process has not proven effective in providing the regular education
teachers
with the support and strategies needed to make accommodations and
modifications.
Return to index
certifications
SE 52 - Appropriate certifications or other
credentials -- related services
Any person, including non-educational personnel, who provides
related
services described under federal special education law, who supervises
paraprofessionals in the provision of related services, or who provides
support services directly to the regular or special classroom teacher
is appropriately certified, licensed, board-registered or otherwise
approved to provide such services by the relevant professional
standards board or agency for the profession.
No documentation of appropriate licenses for the nurses employed
by the district was provided
Return to index
Programs
SE 53 - Use of paraprofessionals
- Paraprofessionals and assistants (e.g., teacher aides, tutors
and
student teachers) are appropriately trained to assist in providing
special
education or related services.
- Persons employed as paraprofessionals and assistants are under
the supervision of an appropriately certified or licensed professional
who is proximate and readily available to provide such supervision.
Interviews indicated that paraprofessionals:
- at the middle school are appropriately supervised and
appropriately trained regarding their roles and responsibilities.
However, it was indicated that paraprofessionals
- at the elementary level are not always appropriately
supervised and fulfill responsibilities assigned to the special
education teachers in the district’s job descriptions.
The district practice has been to hire paraprofessionals to provide
special education services instead of special educators who have the
expertise
to design as well as provide the required IEP services.
Return to index
Staff development
SE 54 - Professional development regarding
special education
The district considers the needs of all staff in developing training
opportunities for professional and paraprofessional staff and provides
a variety of offerings which at a minimum include the following
training topics offered on an annual basis:
- state and federal special education requirements and related
local special education policies and procedures;
- confidentiality of student records;
- training in analyzing and accommodating diverse learning styles
of all students in order to achieve an objective of inclusion in the
regular classroom of students with diverse learning styles;
- methods of collaboration among teachers, paraprofessionals and
teacher assistants to accommodate diverse learning styles;
- training in the provision of pre-referral services within
regular education, teacher mentoring and collaboration and parental
involvement;
- training for all locally hired and contracted transportation
providers on the unique needs of all students being transported in
regular and special transportation vehicles; and
- in cooperation with the special education parent advisory
council, at least one workshop annually within the district on the
rights of students and their parents and guardians under the state and
federal special education laws and makes written materials explaining
such rights available upon request.
In interviews regular and special education staff indicated that
certain topics need to be addressed in the district training: analyzing
and accommodating diverse learning styles; behavioral issues and
classroom management; identification of students with learning
disabilities; and an overview of special education procedures.
In addition, the district has not always documented training with
agendas and attendance sheets and has no formal plan to ensure that
required training are conducted annually.
Return to index
Building
SE 55 - Special education facilities and
classrooms
- The school district provides facilities and classrooms for
eligible students which maximize the inclusion of such students into
the life of the school;
- provide accessibility in order to implement fully each child’s
IEP;
- are at least equal in all physical respects to the average
standards of general education facilities and classrooms; and
- are given the same priority as general education programs for
access to and use of instructional and other space in public schools in
order to minimize the separation or stigmatization of eligible students
Based upon interviews, assessments by the district of individual
school buildings, and observations of classrooms and facilities, the
onsite team has concerns regarding: accessibility, the comparability of
designated special education spaces to spaces used for general
education, the integration of special education students into the life
of the school and the district’s ability, given its use of space, to
preserve student confidentiality and
follow through on IEP services and accommodations.
At the elementary level, hallways are being used for special
education testing and tutoring. In addition, several service providers
are using large open spaces simultaneously to provide IEP services,
tutoring and testing. Some rooms and other spaces that are used to
deliver special education services are not handicapped-accessible, and
doors within the elementary school buildings do not always allow a
physically handicapped student to enter and exit independently.
At the middle school, the substantially separate classroom is at
the end of a corridor and not centrally located. Also, the office and
teaching spaces designated for service providers do not have adequate
room for the provision of special education services.
Return to index
Programs
SE 56 - Special education programs and
services are evaluated
- Special education programs, services and administrative areas
are
regularly evaluated.
- The district develops methods for determining the effectiveness
of programs in assisting students with disabilities to achieve the
goals set forth in their IEPs in the least restrictive environment.
- The district uses information it gathers from annual IEP reviews
to measure the effectiveness of special education programs, and
identifies
programs, services and administrative areas that need improvement or
must
be developed.
- As part of these evaluation procedures, the district measures
the success of programs based on students’ local and statewide
assessment results, drop out rates and graduation rates for special
education students.
The district conducts administrative meetings weekly that include
the special education administrator. In 1999, the elementary special
education program was evaluated by outside consultants; the district
wants to have
its middle school program similarly evaluated. Overall, special
education
programs are not evaluated annually.
Return to top
|
Last updated
March 1, 2005
By Melody Orfei
With thanks to Christine Corr
for all her help. |
o.mel@verizon.net
|